A terrorist by any other name would be just as evil, but for “thousands of women” named Isis, the initialism applied to the jihadist organization of the moment is a pressing concern.
While the White House refers to the fundamentalist group responsible for a string of recent beheadings as “ISIL,” for “the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant,” many media outlets prefer “ISIS,” translating the phrase “al-Sham” as “greater Syria” rather than “the Levant.” (ISIS itself has declared itself a caliphate and nixed any geographic markers: In their view, they’re now simply “the Islamic State,” and the only ones worthy of the title.)
Wading into this schism is Isis Martinez, a Miami mother and founder of a non-profit called the Holistic Health Fund, who has launched a petition asking the media to use “ISIL” exclusively. She claims that she and others with her given name—passed down from Egyptian mythology—have been victims of a “backlash” in recent weeks.
Not a personal attack on me but it's an attack on the name Isis.Here's what happened today when I texted a wrong # :( pic.twitter.com/heG9SfsMRe— Isis Martinez ॐ (@IsisMiami) September 14, 2014
There has been some reasonable pushback, however:
Public consensus or no, it’s unlikely that publications would change their style on account of a few irate Irises: Aside from hewing to their own internal standards of accuracy in reporting, rarely do they band together as an industry to simultaneously adopt a universal new standard for referring to a politically fluid foreign militia. Just ask Al Qaeda, my old college roommate.